Urban Survival Range
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 31, 2010, 07:41:10 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
In an effort to save server space, accounts with no activity over the past 250 days or more may be subject to removal from the site.
16855 Posts in 4005 Topics by 463 Members
Latest Member: uinhopusaip
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Urban Survival Range
|-+  Firearms Discussion
| |-+  Ammunition & Ballistics
| | |-+  OG Wet Pack, Ballistic and Ammunition Testing Data (Moderator: oldgranpa)
| | | |-+  Finally got the SeeCamp 380 "bone test".......
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Finally got the SeeCamp 380 "bone test".......  (Read 6448 times)
oldgranpa
Guest


Email
Finally got the SeeCamp 380 "bone test".......
« on: April 27, 2007, 07:18:55 PM »

Late last year a discussion by several LEO's on another site led to the suggestion that perhaps the best "placement" to stop a villian would be COM (center of mass), armpit high. This would require the bullet to penetrate the sternum bone in order to reach the heart. We determined from calculations comparing the strength of the 1/8 to 1/4" thick sternum to good plywood, that a piece of 3/4" plywood could be used to approximately simulate the sternum for wetpack testing. We knew from previous tests by Box-O-Truth that 9mm and higher calibers would penetrate 3/4" plywood. But there was no data for lower calibers. We then set out to compare a few .380acp pistols with different barrel lengths. All lengths from 3.6" to 2.5" passed the "bone" test and results can be viewed at this site below.

Missing from our data was the SeeCamp LWS 380 with it's 2.1" barrel. The attached picture shows results of the simulated bone test and penetration into the wetpack during tests made today, April 27, 2007 by flyandscuba, Norfdet, and oldgranpa. We didn't test every round out there but this gives a pretty good idea that .380 ammo with the SeeCamp will pass the test and can be depended on for self defense aiming COM, armpit high. Entry holes in the "bone" at right.
Only Rem GoldenSabr 102gr expanded with less penetration than the others.

Shown at bottom is a .22magnum FMJ bullet from a NAA minimagnum revolver for comparison. (We did this as a sort of "calibration" for the bone test since in the first bone test .22mag penetrated.)

og


* SeeCamp bone test.JPG (65.56 KB, 468x473 - viewed 566 times.)
« Last Edit: April 28, 2007, 08:31:14 AM by oldgranpa » Logged
flyandscuba
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 487


Me & my Bride!


Re: Finally got the SeeCamp 380 "bone test".......
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2007, 08:13:42 PM »

In interesting observation from this test was the significant amount and depth of carry of "bone" fragments into the simulated wound channel.  I would expect similar results with actual bone -- thus serving as secondary wounding projectiles from a center chest shot in a self defense scenario.
Logged
Stephen A. Camp
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 17


Re: Finally got the SeeCamp 380 "bone test".......
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2007, 10:18:43 PM »

Hello and thanks.  This is most interesting.

Best.
Logged
flyandscuba
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 487


Me & my Bride!


Re: Finally got the SeeCamp 380 "bone test".......
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2007, 01:32:27 PM »

After seeing for myself the penetration resulting from OG's "micro" NAA mini in 22 WMR, I couldn't pass up the opportunity to get one from a private seller walking around at the local gunshow today.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2007, 01:35:50 PM by flyandscuba » Logged
oldgranpa
Guest


Email
Re: Finally got the SeeCamp 380 "bone test".......
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2007, 04:40:35 PM »

Good purchase. But be sure and use only FMJ ammo in the mini like CCI Maxi-Mag 40gr FMJ. See my "blog" just posted here on the .22magnum for more info.
og

Oh, BTW, fly, if you ever have to shoot at something while in the water, I suggest shaking the water out of the barrel before firing. However, if you have the chance, and dare to try it, maybe try shooting it under water. If you do please let us know, that is if you are still with us. I sure wouldn't try it. Shocked
« Last Edit: May 05, 2007, 04:44:08 PM by oldgranpa » Logged
flyandscuba
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 487


Me & my Bride!


Re: Finally got the SeeCamp 380 "bone test".......
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2007, 05:20:22 PM »

Shooting underwater (completely underwater) is no problem.  My 44 Magnum bang stick works just fine underwater...  Although you do not want you ear in line with the blast when it goes off! Shocked

I've made a mean mess out of an 8' 'Cuda that was interested in my stringer of fish during one dive.  It's not the projectile that does the damage (you could just as well use blanks) -- but the expanding gases that rips a hole in whatever is in contact... Grin
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Urban Survival Range | Powered by SMF 1.0.8.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!